Sascha Bub

• Ecotoxicology is the science that researches effects of toxicants on biological entities. Following the famous toxicological principle formulated 1538 by von Hohenheim, known as Paracelsus, thereby generally all chemicals are able to act as toxicants. Unlike human toxicology that focuses on toxic effects on individuals and populations of one species, Homo sapiens, ecotoxicology is not constrained in its scope of biological entities. It is interested in toxic effects on individuals and populations of any species (excluding humans), and on communities and entire ecosystems (Walker et al., 2012; Köhler & Triebskorn, 2013; Newman 2014). One example of where the ecological foundation of ecotoxicology manifests itself are indirect effects, which are effects on biological entities that are not directly caused by chemicals but instead are mediated by ecological interactions and environmental conditions (Walker et al., 2012). With this large scope, ecotoxicology is an inter- and multidisciplinary science that links chemical, biological and environmental knowledge. With millions of species and at least 100,000 chemicals that potentially interact with them in the environment (Wang et al., 2021), ecotoxicology has a large ground to cover. Among these sheer numbers, there are some groups that are of special importance regarding their potential environmental impact. Pesticides are one group of chemicals that have a large, if not the largest, ecotoxicological relevance: they are toxic for biological entities, sometimes in very low concentrations , and they are used in large amounts and globally (Bernhardt et al., 2017). The high toxicity of pesticides, much higher than that of most other groups of chemicals, is a result of their intended use: they are designed to reduce detrimental effects of, e.g., insects, plants or fungi on agriculture by controlling respective populations, often, and in the sense of their Latin name, through induced lethality (Walker et al., 2012). However, they act not specific enough to be toxic only for the intended species that are considered pests, but also show toxicity towards species living in habitats next to pesticide-treated areas. The widespread agricultural use of pesticides, on the other hand, is a result of their work-and-cost-efficiency for securing yields, but also results in exposure of ecosystems at a global scale (Sharma et al., 2019). In summary, pesticides can be abstractly seen as toxicity intentionally applied to agricultural areas, unintentionally also exposing organisms in non-agricultural areas to toxicity. The risks of pesticide use for ecosystems have led major jurisdictions, like the United States of America (US) and the European Union (EU), to enact elaborated regulatory processes that require a registration of pesticides prior use (EFSA, 2013; EPA, 2011; Stehle & Schulz, 2015b). A by-product of these registration processes are regulatory threshold levels (RTL) which can be used for scientific risk analysis outside the regulatory process (Stehle & Schulz, 2015a). The RTL for an organism group is basically derived from the most sensitive effect concentrations found in standardized toxicity tests for species representative for the group, multiplied by a safety factor, although specifics differ among regulatory processes. Conceptually, they mark the threshold that separates environmental concentrations associated with acceptable risk (concentrations below the RTL) from concentrations associated with unacceptable risk (concentrations above the RTL). Due to the high degree of procedural standardization in the derivation of RTLs, they have been found as a good measure to make the toxicities of different pesticides comparable, and they were employed in a series of studies to characterize environmental pesticide concentrations (e.g., Stehle & Schulz, 2015a; Stehle et al., 2018; Wolfram et al., 2018; Wolfram et al., 2021; Schulz et al., 2021, also, in Appendix B; Bub et al., 2023, also, in Appendix C). RTL reflect, for instance, that insecticides show regulatory unacceptable concentrations towards fish between 3 ng/L (deltamethrin, a pyrethroid) and 110 mg/L (imidacloprid, a neonicotinoid), a range of nine orders of magnitude. At the same, imidacloprid is very toxic to pollinators (RTL of 1.52 ng/organism), while more than 95% of all of the insecticides, with regulatory unacceptable concentrations among insecticides ranging as high as 1,6 mg/organism, indicating a toxicity six orders of magnitude lower than that of imidacloprid. At large-scales, ecotoxicology deals with pesticide impacts on a national (e.g., Bub et al., 2023; Douglas & Tooker, 2015; Hallmann et al., 2014; Schulz et al., 2021; Stehle et al., 2019; Wolfram et al., 2018), continental (Wolfram et al., 2021) or the global scale (Stehle & Schulz, 2015a; Stehle et al., 2018). This maximization of considered scale is in line with the general tendency of ecotoxicology towards larger scales, but generally requires new methodological and conceptual approaches. Historically, individual chemicals and groups of chemicals have been identified that mark, caused by their immense release into the environment, main disruptors of processes in the Earth system, like greenhouses gases for the climate change, chlorofluorocarbons for the depletion of the atmosphere’s ozone layer, dichlorodiphenyl-trichloroethane and other organochlorides for bioaccumulation in food webs and declines in bird populations, etc., but for other phenomena, like declines in biodiversity or numbers of insect species (Outhwaite et al., 2020; Seibold et al., 2019; Vörösmarty et al., 2010), the active part of chemical pollution is only understood to a much lesser extent. There are indicators that pesticides may play a major role This dissertation contributes to the research of large-scale risks of pesticide use, and of large-scale ecotoxicology in general, in several ways (Figure 1). In Chapter 2, it presents a labeled property graph, the MAGIC graph (Meta-Analysis of the Global Impact of Chemicals graph), as a solution to the methodological issues that arise when increasing amounts of data from more and more sources are combined for analysis (Bub et al., 2019; also, in Appendix A). The MAGIC graph is able to link chemical information from different sources, even if these sources use different nomenclatures. This enables analyses that incorporate toxicological data, like thousands of RTLs (for different organism groups and jurisdictions) for hundreds of pesticides, and information on pesticide use and chemical classes. The MAGIC graph is implemented in a way that allows it to be organically extended by additional chemical, biological and environmental data, and eventually scaled to all chemicals of environmental interest. Chapter 3 shows, how the combination of the linked pesticide data with a systemic consideration of pesticide use supports the interpretation of pesticide risks in the US (Schulz et al., 2021; also, in Appendix B). This systemic approach includes a new measure, the total applied toxicity (TAT), which integrates used pesticide amounts and pesticide toxicities, and the consideration of pesticide use as a complex system whose state and evolution can be visualized in phase-space plots. The combination of the described methods and concepts led to a novel view on pesticide risks in the US and can provide a framework for future ecotoxicological research at large scales. Chapter 4 displays the results of the methods and concepts of the US pesticide risk analysis applied to Germany (Bub et al., 2023; also, in Appendix C). A pesticide risk analysis of Germany is of special importance in the context of the EU’s goal to drastically reduce pesticide risks (European Commission, 2020) and Germany being one of the important agricultural producers in the EU. A comparison of the results for Germany to those for the US did also allow to evaluate the impact of scale and differing RTLs, information that can help other ecotoxicological large-scale assessments. Chapter 5 adds a conclusion and an outlook.